LYRICSWIKI… FINALLY [WEB SITE REVIEW]

Links, Music, Reviews — afischer @ 11:02 am

LyricsWiki logoIn the grand spirit of web 2.0 everything gets wikified. Whatever website you used to like there is a new one that anyone can edit. Like a most of web 2.0 a lot of these sites fall on their faces. Sometimes adding AJAX just makes a crappy site with AJAX, but sometimes web 2.0 is exactly what you need. Thus enter LyricWiki.org! If ever their was an idea just waiting to happen this is it and it’s fantastic. Most lyrics websites are awful and mostly exist for the sole purpose of ad revenue from the unholy amount of animated banners (thank heavens for AdBlock). In fact, the web seems to be pretty much a wasteland in the realm of lyrics. Usually in any endeavor there is at least one fantastic site and then a whole bunch of crappy clones of some bootleg version. With lyrics there are just the clones and there is nothing in the way of “indie” lyrics either. You will find Decemberists lyrics but God help you if you want to find even a single stanza of Wooden Wand anything. So when you stumble across something this excellent its time to write a review/hype it.

LyricWiki seems to have gone live in April of this year. Their goal is to have a comprehensive list of lyrics done in the MediaWiki format. Most of their additions so far seem to have come from an automated bot they made to populate the site. However, the potential for a community driven site is massive. I am not really sure what their end goal is but I envision them being absorbed by the Wikipedia, which it seems they might not be opposed to.

I also have some hope that it will evolve into a kind of lyric annotation site. One of my favorite music websites of all time is The Annotated Grateful Dead Lyrics by David Dodd. The only problem is that no one has made a similar website for other bands as far as I can tell. What sets Dodd’s site apart from wretched places like SongMeanings.com is that SongMeanings is worthless for actually finding anything out about the cultural context and allusions in lyrics (OMG! this song is so pretty!!111one). Dodd’s site on the other hand is well researched and fantastic, if not dirtily hippieish. Maybe LyricsWiki has no intention of going that way but the potential is definitely there.

The drawbacks are mostly related to the youth of the site. Wikis like this need a strong community to build and maintain content. They are still trying to recruit that community so tell your friends because I would really like for this project to work. There are some organizational problems that need to be ironed out but the WikiMedia site is nice and clean as always. What they really need is more contributors… so click away, sign up, and get to work. I definitely plan on getting involved in this one and have already posted my inaugural lyrics. These are lyrics that you won’t find anywhere else on the internet… I know I have looked. So go check out “Dead Sue by Wooden Wand and the Sky High Band.

5 Comments »

  1. Although LyricWiki is a HUGE improvement over all other lyric repositories, my excitement was tempered by a big “Thats it?”

    The site’s scope seems too narrow to foster the mass of users needed to support a wiki community. To me, it would make more sense for LyricWiki to be a single component in a larger, more comprehensive music community that would offer a more gratifying experience in order to maintain enthusiasm for adding new content.
    The kinds of fans that seek obscure lyrics would enjoy other information about artists as well. Perhaps adding other web 2ish features like aggregated reviews or tour dates, etc could round out the experience. Wikipedia has an enthusiastic community because it is it fun to explore in addition to being a great reference.

    Comment by evan — 11/20/2006 @ 2:33 pm
  2. I agree completely. The potential is huge but so far it seems kind of stagnant, which it might be if it remains solely lyrics. It could also use some blog coverage from one of the big ones (i.e. BoingBoing) just to generate some user interest. I feel that the site (or another like it) should also specifically try to court the “obscure lyrics crowd.”

    On a side not I found out that there is also Lyriki which seems to almost identical and maybe even less polished.

    Comment by afischer — 11/20/2006 @ 3:15 pm
  3. oooooh. too bad its not as good. Lyriki has a much better name

    Comment by evan — 11/20/2006 @ 8:11 pm
  4. all i have to say is (completely off topic) yay flagship apple store on 5th ave in new york.

    Comment by acosta — 11/22/2006 @ 9:48 am
  5. Puh-leeeese that is so 2005. What are you, some kind of cave man or something?

    Comment by afischer — 11/22/2006 @ 11:58 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

vdov.net is an anthony costa production. ownership of the content provided is retained by the author and by vdov.net.